Monday, November 26, 2012

A changing of the guard


Collecting French stamps is most popular in France. While there are plenty of clubs and journals devoted to French philately in existence outside France, the center of gravity is in France, which is hardly surprising.

In Russian philately we are seeing the end of a long, unnatural period in which Russian philately was most intensively studied outside of Russia. While the Civil War and the 1920s saw a worldwide growth of interest in Russian philately, in the Soviet Union itself philately came to a screeching halt when stamp collectors were deemed to be suspicious characters because of their contacts with the outside world. Philatelists were purged along with everyone else during the Great Terror, and serious philately recovered only slowly, the appearance of a reborn “Soviet Collector” in the 1960s being the first sign that something was stirring again in the USSR.

In the meantime, Russian philately flourished outside Russia. After WW2 the BSRP started its long love affair with Russian philately, while yet another incarnation of the Rossica Society was founded in the USA. Other countries soon followed: Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden, Canada, Australia and New Zealand all had or have Russian philatelic societies.

But philatelists outside Russia were in a uniquely handicapped position. The lack of access to primary sources (e.g. postal archives) meant that Russian philately abroad developed as an “empirical” field. Outstanding postmark studies came into being simply by inventorying the material in our collections. Specialized stamp and postal history studies were based on material in collections, not on Goznak archives.

Tantalizing hints of what could be achieved with archive access came when the reborn Soviet Collector started publishing serious philatelic studies by Soviet philatelists. In the USA, the Library on Congress turned out to have a nice collection of official Russian publications as well, and in recent years Dr. Howard Weinert has used the interlibrary loan program as an impressive philatelic research tool. But the philatelic research achievements outside Russia have mostly been impressive because they were achieved at all, despite the handicap of having no or limited access to those all-important archives.

After the glasnost’ thaw, contacts between philatelists inside and outside the USSR intensified and we saw a flood of articles from serious philatelists inside the USSR appear in translation in Western journals. While 70+ years of active philatelic research had produced an immense mountain of knowledge in the West, seeing what access to archives could do was an eye-opener. While there were and are Western philatelists who combine intense study of their collections with archive research where this could be achieved, seeing nuggets of information unearthed from the archives of the Russian post and Goznak was and is wonderful.

Another big difference between philatelists inside and outside the former Soviet Union is their choice of subjects. Obviously, very few journals here in the West ever ran articles on “Lenin’s contribution to world peace through philately” or something like that, but even disregarding the obvious political differences, the Imperial and Civil War periods were far more popular in the West than the Soviet period, while the reverse seems to have been true in the USSR. And in Post-Soviet Russia? The Civil War is attracting growing interest, and the fine catalogs and handbooks now available for the Imperial period are signs that the pre-revolutionary period is more popular than ever before.

Demographics are another factor. The “Russian” philatelic societies in the West have an aging membership base, and it has become increasingly difficult to keep them going. It is not surprising that the Canadian Society of Russian Philately ceased publishing its very fine journal The Post-Rider, and the BSRP also had and has problems finding enough volunteers to do the inevitable work that keeps a society functioning.

Perhaps what we’re seeing is the end of an era: the end of a long period during which Russian philately flourished more outside Russia than inside Russia. The “Russian” philatelists in the West have done an outstanding job in keeping the field alive and well during the last 70 years, and have left a legacy of philatelic articles, books and exhibits that is now becoming available to an ever-increasing number of people through the internet. But the center of gravity may be shifting to Russia itself, where a new generation of philatelists is eagerly exploring a new world of philately. I think they’ll find the Western legacy to Russian philately a great basis for further expansion. We wish them well.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Nope, not buying it (literally)

The last White issue from the Crimea is the 100R surcharge on 1k Arms stamps. As is by now well known, these never saw use and left the Crimea in the luggage of the Whites' Evil Philatelist, Shredinskii. I've read references that Shredinskii also exported a Crimean postmark so he could concoct "used" copies, and I've seen (rather suspiciously clean) covers with 1919 dates that were identified by greater experts than me as Paris Products.
So when the cover below popped up on eBay I had to get past my initial impulse (Crimea! Civil War! 1920! Buy! Buy! Buy! Want!) and let sanity prevail.

This purports to be a letter from Sevastopol' to Yalta dated sometime in October 1920. It's a fake, in my opinion. The rate is wrong (should be 100R if it's after 15 October and 5R if it's before 15 October), no Yalta receiver (not impossible but uncommon, even for non-registered mail) and that postmark...
I collect Crimean postmarks and maintain a small database of information and pictures about them. This seems to be a legitimate postmark (SEVASTOPOL' TAVR.G. serial "k") but it seems to pop up a lot on faked covers...
So no. The cover went for a little over $100 - a price that is far too low if it were legitimate - so I think I'm not alone in disliking it...